Deploying and evolving
A harness is a self-contained folder (harness.yaml + hooks + .hiveloom/traces/).
Like a docker-compose.yml, it is portable and versionable but needs the engine
(pip install hiveloom) wherever it lands. This document describes the loop that
lets you deploy a harness anywhere and still improve it over time.
Two properties make the loop work
- Traces travel by default. Every
hiveloom runwrites an append-only JSONL trace into the harness's in-folder.hiveloom/traces/. Wherever the harness runs, it accumulates its own memory next to itself. - Ingestion is idempotent by
run_id. The Hive can absorb the same trace directory any number of times without double-counting — which is what makes "copy it back and evolve" safe.
Run and evolve are separated — on purpose
The running deployment does not evolve itself:
- Running uses a small, cheap executor model in the hot path.
- Evolving uses a strong model plus human approval for any code change — off the hot path, and never in production latency or cost.
- Evolution is a gated, versioned, auditable mutation, not silent drift.
The evolver can never change
guardrails,model,logging.redact,extensions,hooks,mcp_servers, orevolution.auto_propose; regenerated code hooks require explicit y/n approval; every applied change bumps an# evolved: Ncounter and records old→new version hashes in the Hive.
"Still evolving" therefore means the harness emits the signal (traces) wherever it runs, and you close the loop deliberately — not that it mutates live.
The loop
PROD (anywhere) DEV / CI (evolution box)
───────────────── ────────────────────────
hiveloom run . --input … ── traces ─▶ hiveloom evolve ./harness
(cheap model, gated) flow (re-ingests in-folder traces,
writes .hiveloom/traces/ strong model proposes a gated
│ mutation, you approve)
│ │
└─────────── redeploy new version ◀───────┘
(# evolved: N+1, new version hash)
hiveloom stats ./harness → success rate / cost / turns PER VERSION HASH
= the fitness signal that proves it helped
Step by step:
-
Run the harness wherever it lives:
hiveloom run . --input FILE --json. Each run auto-ingests into the local Hive and appends to.hiveloom/traces/. -
Collect the traces on an evolution box. Both
hiveloom stats <dir>andhiveloom evolve <dir>ingest a harness directory's in-folder traces on the fly (idempotent byrun_id), so a harness that ran in production for a week can be copied back and analyzed against real failures. -
Evolve:
hiveloom evolve ./harnessreads the Hive's clustered failures, asks a strong model for a minimal mutation, gates it (see above), and applies it — bumping# evolved: Nand recording the new version hash.The analysis is scoped to the current version hash: only failures of the harness as it is right now. So the loop is genuinely a loop — after applying a mutation (or editing the folder by hand) you must run the harness again before there is anything to evolve from, and
evolvesays so:nothing to evolve — no failures recorded for the current harness version (94 on earlier versions) — re-run the harness to collect fresh ones. Pooling versions instead would keep proposing fixes for failures the previous mutation already repaired. -
Redeploy the updated folder.
-
Judge:
hiveloom stats ./harnessreports success rate, cost, and turns per version hash. Because runs on the new harness land under a new hash, you can see whether the mutation actually helped. Rollback is reverting the folder to the previousharness.yaml(git makes this a one-liner); the version hash keeps the before/after comparable.
Queuing proposals instead of applying them
hiveloom evolve <dir> --propose runs the same analyze → propose → gate
pipeline but queues the gated result in the Hive instead of applying it —
"auto-propose, human applies." A proposal is deduped by harness, spec version,
and failure signature, so re-running --propose against the same failure
state never pays for a second strong-model call; it just returns the existing
pending proposal.
hiveloom evolve ./harness --propose --json # queue a gated proposal
hiveloom proposals list ./harness # review what's pending
hiveloom proposals show ./harness <id> # inspect rationale + gate result
hiveloom proposals apply ./harness <id> # apply it (re-checks the harness
# hasn't changed since drafting)
hiveloom proposals reject ./harness <id> --reason "not worth it"
There is no auto-apply: a human always calls proposals apply or
proposals reject. This is the additive extension the trace sink / networked
Hive / A/B runner discussion below anticipates — proposals live in the same
Hive as runs and evolutions, so a later automatic trigger or HTTP control plane
can populate the same queue without changing this review step.
Auto-DRAFT (opt-in) — auto-APPLY still does not exist
A harness can opt in to drafting proposals automatically, right after a
failing run, via evolution.auto_propose in harness.yaml:
evolution:
auto_propose:
enabled: true # off by default
min_failures: 5 # non-success runs of THIS version, since the last auto-proposal
cooldown_hours: 24.0 # minimum gap between auto-drafted proposals
model: null # strong-model override; else the CLI/env default
This is a synchronous check at the tail of every completed hiveloom run —
no daemon, no scheduler, no background thread. It costs nothing for the
(default, disabled) common case: a single boolean check, no Hive query. When
enabled and a run fails, it counts recent failures of the current version
(same scope as evolve, so the threshold and the analysis always agree on which
failures count), checks the cooldown, and — if both pass — analyzes the Hive and
drafts a gated proposal with
trigger="auto", deduped exactly like --propose (a second failing run
against the same failure state never pays for a second strong-model call).
It only ever drafts. Applying still requires hiveloom proposals apply.
A failure here (no API key, no network, a malformed model response) never
fails the run itself — same discipline as trace ingestion.
cooldown_hours cannot be removed: values below one minute are rejected, so
there's always a real floor on how often a harness can auto-draft. Each
qualifying failing run costs a strong-model call unless the dedup pre-check
catches it, so this is partly a spend guard; min_failures is the
complementary throttle if you want a different shape of restraint.
If you'd rather not pay this tail latency inside every run, leave
auto_propose off and instead schedule hiveloom evolve <dir> --propose
from cron (or your platform's scheduler) against the deployed harness — same
queue, same dedup, just triggered on your own cadence instead of per-run.
Deployment topologies
- Same box — deploy the folder; runs ingest into the local Hive
(
~/.hiveloom/hive.db, override with$HIVELOOM_DB);hiveloom evolve .in place. - Prod + central evolution — prod writes in-folder traces; sync
.hiveloom/traces/back (rsync, a mounted volume, object-store sync, a git-of-traces) to a dev/CI box that runsevolve, then redeploy the bumped folder. - Docker —
hiveloom package --dockerproduces a runnable image (ENTRYPOINT ["hiveloom", "run", ".", "--json"]). For a release already on PyPI, the generated Dockerfile installs the lockedhiveloomversion. Before publishing (or when hiveloom is served from a private index), first runuv build, then pass--runtime-wheel dist/hiveloom-<version>-py3-none-any.whl; the artifact embeds that exact wheel. Its generated.dockerignoreexcludes.envand.hiveloom/from the build context. This embeds hiveloom itself; a fully air-gapped image also needs a wheelhouse for its third-party dependencies. Mount.hiveloom/tracesto a shared volume so every replica feeds the same trace pool. - HTTP service —
hiveloom package --docker --servebuilds the same image withhiveloom serveas the entrypoint: a long-lived container answeringPOST /runs({"input": "...", "stream": true}streams trace events as NDJSON, finalrun_resultline last) withGET /healthzfor probes. SetHIVELOOM_API_KEYto require aBearer/X-API-Keyheader on/runs— but treat that as defense in depth and put real authentication in your gateway. Run inputs over HTTP are always literal text, never file paths, so remote callers cannot read files out of the container. Because the harness executes model-written code hooks, the container is the sandbox: no docker socket, read-only filesystem outside the harness dir, and an egress policy. Traces still land in.hiveloom/traces/in-container, so the evolve loop works unchanged — or capture the/runsstream at your gateway and ship events wherever you like. - MCP server (agent-facing) —
hiveloom mcp serve DIR [DIR ...]exposes each harness as an MCP tool (run_<name>) so an MCP-capable agent can delegate a task and get back a structured, validator-checked result ({status, output, reason, cost_usd, turns, run_id, verdicts}). Alist_harnessestool carries the catalog with each harness's measured fitness (runs, success rate, avg cost/turns from the Hive) so callers pick on evidence. Register harnesses once (hiveloom registry add <dir>) and serve the whole registry with--registered; broken entries are skipped with a stderr warning. Transport is stdio by default — the right choice for a local agent's MCP config — or streamable HTTP at/mcpwith--http [--host] [--port], gated byHIVELOOM_API_KEY(BearerorX-API-Key); a non-loopback bind without the key is refused. Same caller contract as the HTTP servers: input is always literal text, and trust is enforced per directory at startup (the command is non-interactive — stdout is the protocol channel — so approve foreign folders withhiveloom trustfirst). Delegated runs land in the Hive like any other, so tasks handed over by other agents drive the evolve loop too. - Git-backed harness — keep
harness.yaml+ hooks in git (traces are gitignored byinit). Evolution produces a clean diff (the# evolvedcounter and version hash); commit it and redeploy. Rollback =git revert.
What is intentionally left to you
The artifact and memory models are portable and complete; the transport between "runs anywhere" and "evolves centrally" is deliberately out of scope for now:
- Trace collection is manual — there is no built-in sync/push or pluggable
trace sink; you move
.hiveloom/traces/with whatever tooling you already use. - The Hive is single-machine SQLite — many replicas cannot all write one Hive concurrently; a central multi-deployment Hive would need a networked backend.
- Judging is human-in-the-loop —
statsgives you the per-version-hash signal to decide; automated A/B re-runs and auto-promote/rollback are future work (the schema's version-hash bucketing is designed to support them).
These are additive: the idempotent-by-run_id, version-hash-bucketed foundation
was chosen precisely so a trace sink, a networked Hive, or an A/B runner can be
bolted on without rethinking the loop.